Overland Park Wire Fraud Attorney

Home » Overland Park Criminal Defense Lawyers » Financial Crime Attorney in Overland Park, Kansas » Overland Park Wire Fraud Attorney

Wire Fraud Defense in Overland Park and Throughout Kansas

Wire fraud is a serious charge, and it can lead to major criminal penalties like prison and fines. You want a defense strategy that is tailored to the exact circumstances of your case, and that has anticipated and addresses any potential issues you may face. When the stakes are this high, you need a defense lawyer with the resources and skills to handle such a complex case.

You can find that attorney at Joseph, Hollander & Craft. Our team in Overland Park works tirelessly to defend our clients against criminal charges. We can help you explore your options and seek the best possible outcome to your case. Learn more about how our wire fraud defense lawyer can serve you.

What Is Wire Fraud Under Federal Law?

The federal offense of wire fraud is codified at 18 U.S. Code § 1343. According to this statute, wire fraud is, broadly, the act of transmitting a communication over state lines for purposes of defrauding someone. More specifically, this crime can be broken down into the following four elements:

• Voluntarily and intentionally devising or participating in a scheme to defraud another person out of money
• Doing so with the intent to defraud
• That it was reasonably foreseeable that interstate wire communications would be used
• That interstate wire communications were in fact used

Wire Fraud vs. Mail Fraud

The wire fraud statute is similar to that of mail fraud, except that wire fraud involves certain specific means of communications such as phone, email, text, and internet. Mail fraud, as the term implies, involves the use of mail services such as the U.S. Postal Service or private carriers like FedEx to commit fraud.

Does Kansas Have a Wire Fraud Law?

Kansas criminalizes various means of committing fraud. For example:

• Criminal use of a financial card (KSA 21-5828)
• Making false information (KSA 21-5824)
• Forgery (KSA 21-5823)
• Identity Theft (KSA 21-6107)

However, there is no state wire fraud statute. Wire fraud is charged as a federal crime.

What Can Lead to Wire Fraud Charges?

Wire fraud is commonly charged for the following types of activities:

• Telemarketing fraud: Telemarketers often call victims and tell them they have won a prize or are being offered a good deal for goods or services. They take money from the victim’s credit or debit card, sometimes under the pretense of covering “processing fees” for a fictitious prize. They often steal the victim’s identity in the process to perpetuate additional schemes. This category also includes calls from scammers pretending to be with law enforcement or federal agencies like the IRS. These callers ask for money as a means of resolving a “warrant.”
• Non-delivery and non-payment fraud: This type of fraud is often seen on social media, such as Facebook Marketplace. The scammer takes money and never delivers the good, or receives the good but never pays for it. Because of the ease of creating fake social media accounts or pretending to be a legitimate business, this form of wire fraud is rampant.
• Phishing schemes: Phishing is the act of posing as a legitimate business, like a bank, and communicating with its customers over text, email, or the phone. The imposter convinces the victim to hand over their sensitive information like Social Security number, bank account number, or password.
• Electronic financial transfers: Unauthorized electronic transfers of funds are also a form of wire fraud. This includes transactions over a bank’s wire transfer system, moving money in and out of an account without permission, or the misuse of online banking with the intent to defraud someone.
• Data breach: A data breach is a more forceful theft of someone’s sensitive personal information, occurring primarily through hacking and similar activities. Hackers use cyber attacks and computer viruses to exploit outdated and unsophisticated online security systems and access personal data. They frequently sell this information on the black market.
• Ransomware attacks: Ransomware is software that a person unwittingly installs on their computer by clicking a link which opens a computer virus. The software attacks programs on the computer by encrypting data and making it inaccessible to the user. To remove the virus and restore normal functioning, the victim is told to pay an often substantial ransom.
• Impersonation: Sometimes wire fraud is relatively simple. An individual pretends to be someone the victim knows, like their child or a cousin, who has suddenly fallen into a dire situation. They beg the victim for money, and the victim believes they are sending their money to the actual person the scammer claims to be.

The Role of Electronic Communications in Wire Fraud Cases

When Congress enacted the original wire fraud statute, the term “wire” referred to communication methods such as telephone, radio, and television. While those forms of communication still fall within the statute, modern wire fraud cases are far more likely to involve email, text messaging, online platforms, and other internet-based communications.

Because of this shift, prosecutors often focus heavily on the content and context of electronic communications when building a case. Emails, text messages, and online account activity are frequently used to argue that a defendant intended to mislead or defraud another party. In many cases, these communications become the foundation of the government’s theory.

However, the presence of electronic communications does not automatically establish fraudulent intent. Messages can be taken out of context, misinterpreted, or selectively presented. Informal language, incomplete conversations, or third-party involvement can all complicate the narrative the government is trying to construct.

For example, communications that the government characterizes as deceptive may instead reflect:

• Misunderstandings between parties rather than intentional misrepresentation
• Business negotiations where terms were unclear or evolving
• Reliance on information provided by others that later proved inaccurate
• Poorly worded or informal messages that do not reflect actual intent

In other situations, the government may rely on patterns of communication to suggest a scheme, even where there is no direct evidence of intent to defraud. This is particularly common in cases involving multiple transactions or extended timelines.

Electronic evidence can be powerful, but it is not always definitive. A strong defense often involves examining the full context of the communications, identifying gaps or inconsistencies, and challenging assumptions about what those messages actually prove.

Which Federal Agencies Investigate Wire Fraud?

Numerous federal agencies investigate wire fraud, depending on the nature of the fraud, its victims, and its scale. These are the agencies typically involved with this crime:

• FBI: The FBI is the primary agency handling cybercrime in any form (through its Internet Crime Compliant Center division), corporate fraud, and large, complex schemes that are usually nationwide or international.
• Department of Justice: The DOJ coordinates with the FBI and other federal and state agencies to bring cases to court and prosecute wire fraud.
• IRS: When the allegations involve fraudulent statements related to taxes, the IRS will be involved through its Criminal Investigation Division.
• U.S. Postal Inspection Service: Wire fraud often overlaps with mail fraud, which is where the U.S. Postal Service will step in.
• Securities and Exchange Commission: Wire fraud is frequently tied in with securities fraud and similar crimes. The SEC will therefore coordinate with other agencies.
• Federal Trade Commission: The FTC is responsible for investigating various forms of consumer fraud, and may therefore be involved in your case.

Each of these agencies pursues cases in different ways. As such, the defense strategies needed can vary significantly. At Joseph, Hollander & Craft, we understand how each agency operates, and can craft a defense tailored to those operations.

What a Federal Wire Fraud Investigation Looks Like

If you believe you’re under investigation, it helps to understand how these cases typically develop. Most federal wire fraud investigations follow a similar path, although the timeline and intensity can vary:

• It usually starts quietly: An investigation may begin because of a complaint, a flagged transaction, or activity that draws attention from a federal agency. In many cases, you won’t know it’s happening at this stage.
• Agents begin gathering information: Investigators look at emails, phone records, bank activity, and other communications. Early on, this can involve reviewing records they can access without notifying you.
• The investigation becomes formal: If agents believe there may be a case, prosecutors get involved. At that point, they can issue subpoenas, execute search warrants, and conduct interviews. This is often when the investigation becomes more visible.
• A grand jury may be used: Prosecutors present evidence to a grand jury to seek an indictment. These proceedings happen behind closed doors, and the defense does not participate.
• Charges are filed or you’re asked to appear in court: If the grand jury returns an indictment, you may be arrested or receive a summons. This is typically the first time you see the government’s case laid out in formal charges.

Each step builds on the last. By the time charges are filed, the government has often been working on the case for months or longer. That’s why getting legal counsel involved early can make a meaningful difference in how the situation unfolds.

Wire Fraud Allegations Involving Multiple Defendants

Wire fraud cases often involve more than one person. While that can make the government’s case seem more serious, it also creates complications that a defense attorney can use to your advantage.

• Conspiracy charges expand the case, but also raise the burden of proof: Prosecutors frequently add a conspiracy charge, which requires them to prove there was an actual agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act. It is not enough to show that people were involved in the same transactions. The government has to establish a shared objective and an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. Where relationships are informal or loosely connected, this can be difficult to prove.
• Different defendants, different levels of intent: In multi-defendant cases, not everyone plays the same role. The government must prove that each individual had the specific intent required for wire fraud. That creates opportunities to distinguish your actions, your knowledge, and your purpose from others involved. A defense may focus on showing that you lacked the intent the government is trying to attribute to you.
• Large volumes of evidence can work both ways: More defendants typically means more emails, messages, financial records, and transactions. While prosecutors rely on this volume to build their case, it also increases the likelihood of inconsistencies, gaps, and conflicting interpretations. A careful review of the record can reveal information that undercuts the government’s narrative.
• Cooperation between defendants introduces uncertainty: In some cases, one or more defendants may choose to cooperate with the government. These individuals may provide statements in exchange for more favorable treatment. However, their credibility can be challenged, particularly if they have incentives to shift blame or minimize their own role.
• Multiple agencies can complicate the investigation: When more than one agency is involved, coordination becomes more difficult. Information may be gathered at different times, through different methods, and with varying priorities. This can create inconsistencies in how the case is developed and presented.

Multi-defendant cases are rarely straightforward. The same factors that make them more complex for the government can also create meaningful opportunities to challenge the allegations and narrow the issues in dispute.

Penalties for Wire Fraud Convictions in Kansas

Prosecutors take wire fraud seriously, a fact that is reflected in the potential consequences of a sentence. A federal criminal defense attorney can explain more about the likely penalties in your case, which may include:

• Prison: A sentence of up to 20 years in prison for each wire fraud count is possible. The actual sentence will depend on the amount of financial loss, the defendant’s criminal history, and aggravating and mitigating factors.
• Fines: Individuals can face fines of up to $250,000 per count, while organizations may have to pay up to $500,000. These are separate and apart from restitution (see below).
• Enhanced penalties: If the wire fraud involves a financial institution or a presidentially declared emergency or disaster, the prison sentence could be up to 30 years and the fines could be up to $1 million for each count.
• Restitution: Courts will typically require the defendants to pay financial restitution to the victims they defrauded. The amount can easily reach into the millions of dollars.
• Forfeiture: Property related to the fraud can also be seized and turned over to the government.
• State charges: Although wire fraud is almost always a federal offense, it may involve other forms of fraud that can be prosecuted at the state level. This means potentially more fines, jail time, and other penalties.

Importantly, the above penalties are for each count of wire fraud. Each individual act of wire fraud, like the sending of an email or text, can constitute a separate count. The penalties can therefore quickly become substantial.

Defense Strategies for Federal Criminal Charges

When you are facing potential wire fraud allegations, timing matters. Defense strategy does not begin at arraignment; it often starts well before charges are filed. Early involvement allows your defense lawyer to assess the government’s theory, identify weaknesses, and take steps that may influence how the case develops.

Our Overland Park criminal defense attorneys represent clients by:

• Applying a detailed understanding of the wire fraud statute: A strong defense starts with a close reading of the law and how courts have interpreted it. This allows your attorney to identify gaps in the government’s case, particularly where key elements like intent or use of interstate communications may not be clearly established.
• Challenging the government’s narrative: Prosecutors often build their case around selected communications and financial records. We work to place those facts in proper context, highlight inconsistencies, and present alternative explanations that reflect what actually occurred.
• Developing case-specific defenses: Wire fraud cases often turn on intent. We examine whether the evidence truly shows an intent to defraud or whether it reflects misunderstandings, incomplete information, or legitimate business activity. Every case requires a tailored approach based on the available evidence.
• Intervening early in the investigation: In some situations, it is possible to engage with investigators or prosecutors before charges are filed. Early advocacy can help clarify facts, correct assumptions, and in some cases limit the scope of the investigation.
• Negotiating from a position of strength: Plea discussions are common in federal cases, but they require a clear understanding of the evidence and the risks on both sides. We evaluate all options carefully and advise clients based on the specific posture of their case.

Federal wire fraud charges carry serious consequences, but they are not automatic convictions. A thoughtful, proactive defense can shape how the case unfolds from the earliest stages.

Find a Wire Fraud Defense Lawyer Near Me

Joseph, Hollander & Craft sees clients in our Overland Park office at 10104 W 105th St. We are on the corner of Mastin Street and directly across from the Overland Park Radiation Oncology VA Clinic. We can be reached by phone at 913-948-9490.

Wire Fraud in Overland Park: Frequently Asked Questions

Can you appeal a wire fraud conviction?

You may be able to appeal the final judgment against you, meaning the conviction itself and the sentence, if legal or procedural errors (such as the improper admission of evidence) occurred during the trial. Our criminal appeal attorneys can represent you.

Can you be charged with wire fraud if you never received any money?

Yes, you can be charged with wire fraud even if you didn’t receive money. The focus of a wire fraud charge is the intent to commit fraud and the use of interstate means to do so, not whether the scheme was successful.

Can wire fraud charges arise from investment opportunities or business deals that fail?

Yes, if there is evidence of intent to defraud. A failed business deal or unsuccessful investment is not, itself, enough to give rise to charges.

Can you be charged with wire fraud for forwarding or relaying someone else’s communications?

Yes, if you knew or should reasonably have known that they were part of a scheme to defraud someone. Prosecutors must prove this knowledge element and that by forwarding or relaying the communication you intended to further the fraud.

Contact Our Wire Fraud Attorneys in Overland Park Today

Don’t leave your future to chance. If you have been charged with wire fraud or you are concerned that you may be charged, the time is now to reach out to a federal wire fraud defense lawyer. The Overland Park office of Joseph, Hollander & Craft is ready to serve you. We also have offices in Lawrence, Topeka, and Wichita, and in Kansas City, MO. You can contact us today to get started building your defense.